Hey, thank you so much for reading. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
First, I don't think these two are as incongruent as you might think. What's possible isn't always what is, if you catch my drift. It might not even be what is most of the time or any of the times.
I also think there's a lot wider of a spectrum that gets lost in the sauce. Science deals with averages most of the time which means it intentionally misses individual cases, especially edge cases.
In the article, I say "man" and "woman" a lot, but even those are scientific generalizations across a wide, all-encompassing spectrum where people don't always fit nicely into those two little boxes.
What's possible for me may not be possble for you and vice versa. I'm also quite neurodiverse, just in different ways, so I definitely understand how it goes. Who else besides a neurodivergent person would dig into all these figures for fun and then write an article about it?
Thank you again, so much, for reading. I sincerely appreciate it. Maybe next time I'll do one on neurodivergence and attraction. It sounds like a fun, interesting deep dive.
Cheers. :)